DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
Dear saiimeiaeigge
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 16 January 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board did not accept
your contention that you were discharged for failing to disclose
a pre-service history of counseling conducted by a high school
counselor. Records available to the Board indicate that you were
discharged because of your failure to make timely disclosure
of your disqualifying history of suicidal behavior.
Accordingly, and as you have not demonstrated that it would be
in the interest of justice for the Board to aspign a reentry
code more favorable than RE-4, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the panel members will
be furnished upon request.
The Board din not consider your request for correction of the
reason and authority for your separation because you failed to
exhaust an available administrative remedy by submitting an
application for review of your discharge to the Naval Discharge
Review Board.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. Inthis regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an orricial
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Sere’, Fee
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04617-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 16 February 2005 at age 23. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02892-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01543-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As you have not demonstrated that you should have received a more favorable reentry code than RE-3P, and as you were fortunate to have received that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07576-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 November 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00894-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded further that you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for it to assign you a more favorable reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07964-06
07964-06 2 February 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06435-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 1 February 2002. Your were discharged on 27 July 1972 pursuant to the approved findings of a medical board that you failed to meet the minimum physical standards for enlistment because of the residual effects of a knee injury you sustained in January 1972, which you failed to disclose when you underwent your pre- enlistment physical examination. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00439-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. authority directed separation under honorable conditions by reason of unsuitability and on 8 November 1951, while serving as a seaman recruit, you were issued a general discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03983-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05283-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, -when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...